Legal Opinion · Dissent

Byrd v. Shaffer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1999No. S99A0934Published

1DissentCarley, Justice

In my opinion, the majority erroneously holds that, in a habeas corpus proceeding, the State has the burden of establishing that the petitioner’s guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. The State is not a party to this, or any other, habeas case. A petition for habeas relief institutes a civil, not a criminal, action. “It is a collateral attack that is separate and distinct from direct review, and occurs only after a prisoner has failed to obtain relief by direct appeal. [Cit.] It is not an extension of [a] direct appeal .... [Cit.]” Gibson v. Turpin, 270 Ga. 855, 857…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Purvis v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API