Byrd v. Shaffer
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentCarley, Justice
In my opinion, the majority erroneously holds that, in a habeas corpus proceeding, the State has the burden of establishing that the petitioner’s guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. The State is not a party to this, or any other, habeas case. A petition for habeas relief institutes a civil, not a criminal, action. “It is a collateral attack that is separate and distinct from direct review, and occurs only after a prisoner has failed to obtain relief by direct appeal. [Cit.] It is not an extension of [a] direct appeal .... [Cit.]” Gibson v. Turpin, 270 Ga. 855, 857…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Purvis v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.