Legal Opinion

People v. Lester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: The Constitution and applicable statutes unequivocally command that "crimes prosecuted by indictment shall be tried by a jury composed of twelve persons” (NY Const, art VI, § 18 [a]; CPL 260.10, 270.05 [1]; see also, People v Warren, 145 AD2d 966; People v Dean, 80 AD2d 695, 696). An indicted defendant cannot consent to a trial by fewer than 12 jurors (Cancemi v People, 18 NY 128; see also, People v Ahmed, 66 NY2d 307, 310-311, rearg denied 67 NY2d 647; People v Mitchell, 266 NY 15,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. People v. AhmedNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Vose v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. People v. . CosmoNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. People v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GajadharAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Stressler v. HynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Bell v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. FordNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. GajadaharNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API