Legal Opinion

Bell v. Sherman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR arti*739ele 78 to prohibit the respondents from proceeding further against the petitioner on Queens County Indictment Number QN12163/88.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

A juror who has not heard all of the evidence in a case is grossly unqualified to render a verdict and must, therefore, be discharged (see, People v Russell, 112 AD2d 451, 452). Where, as here, the discharge of the juror makes it impossible to continue with the trial, principles of double jeopardy will not act to bar a retrial (CPL…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. People v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. LesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Stressler v. HynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GajadharAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Mikel v. MarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. GajadaharNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API