Legal Opinion

People v. Doto

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 21, 1977No. 62165, 62166 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The defendants, James Doto and Eugene Doladkowski, were charged in separate complaints with obscenity in violation of section 11—20 of the Criminal Code of 1961 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 11—20). Both were found guilty in separate proceedings before the trial court sitting without a jury, and each was fined $100. Their cases were consolidated for purposes of this appeal. The defendants argue that the evidence failed to establish the defendants’ knowledge of the contents of the publications and therefore, they were not proved guilty of obscenity beyond a reasonable doubt; that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. The People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. The PEOPLE v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Illinois Public Aid Commission v. SandersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. BenfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BlackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. People v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. People v. LavoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. People v. HartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. MahdiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API