Legal Opinion

In Re Holland Furnace Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 27, 1965No. 13671_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This criminal contempt proceeding was begun on petition of the Federal Trade Commission alleging that respondents “knowingly, wilfully and intentionally” violated and disobeyed an order of this court of August 5, 1959, directed against respondents, by failing and refusing to comply with said order. The Rules to Show Cause issued. Issues were joined by respondents’ answers, and this court, without a jury, 1 heard evidence and arguments on the issues.

In the August 5, 1959 order of this court, respondents were “commanded forthwith to obey and comply” with an FTC order, entered July 7, 1958,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Holland Furnace Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. United States v. Greyhound CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
  5. Guernsey v. Rich Plan of the MidwestDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API