Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Hipcamp Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 22, 2024No. 3:23-cv-06156Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT TACOMA 6 JACOB MARSHALL, Case No. 3:23-cv-06156-TLF 7 Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 8 COMPEL ARBITRATION HIPCAMP INC., et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 This matter comes before the Court on defendant Hipcamp, Inc.’s motion to 12 compel arbitration. Dkt. 31. Plaintiff opposes the motion. Dkt. 34. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 13 § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule MJR 13, the parties have 14 consented to have this matter heard by the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 42. 15 BACKGROUND 16 I. Facts 17…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.