Luftheizungs Und Abgasverwertungs v. Rys
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefer,
This appeal is from an order striking off a statement of claim because of its insufficiency under the requirements of section 5 of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, 12 PS Sec. 386, that all papers upon which the pleader relies be attached to his pleading.
The statement of claim avers that Luftheizungs Und Abgasverwertungs, a German concern, assigned its claim against defendant’s decedent to Stern-Stuempfl & Co., the use plaintiff. The claim is based upon a letter of the legal plaintiff’s agents, Hundt & Weber, dated September, 1928, offering the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Georges Township v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Riling v. IdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Acme Manufacturing Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Bradly v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Security T. & T. Co. v. Welsh & BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Myers v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946