Legal Opinion

Luftheizungs Und Abgasverwertungs v. Rys

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1938No. Appeal, 136PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

This appeal is from an order striking off a statement of claim because of its insufficiency under the requirements of section 5 of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, 12 PS Sec. 386, that all papers upon which the pleader relies be attached to his pleading.

The statement of claim avers that Luftheizungs Und Abgasverwertungs, a German concern, assigned its claim against defendant’s decedent to Stern-Stuempfl & Co., the use plaintiff. The claim is based upon a letter of the legal plaintiff’s agents, Hundt & Weber, dated September, 1928, offering the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georges Township v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Riling v. IdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Acme Manufacturing Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Bradly v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Security T. & T. Co. v. Welsh & BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myers v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API