Legal Opinion

Green v. Hollidaysburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1912No. Appeal, No. 121PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal, No. 121, Jan. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Blair Co., March T., 1911, No. 129, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Teresa Green v. Hollidaysburg Borough. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries.. Before Shull, P. J., specially presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $1,551.94. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were various instructions, quoting them.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff, a woman sixty-eight years of age, was injured by a fall at night on an icy pavement on the main street of the borough, defendant. The only question to be considered is whether her testimony made out a case of negligence on the part of the borough, free of contributory negligence, which entitled her to go to the jury. The pavement was clear of ice except at the place of the accident, where water from a rain spout ran onto the pavement and froze in ridges from four to six inches *432high, that extended across the pavement from the house line to the curb. This condition had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Dean v. City of New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Brown v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Wyman v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Beebe v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Davis v. Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Weismiller Et Vir. v. FarrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Duvall v. City of New CastleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API