Legal Opinion
Albert Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates Law Offices of Melvin James Kaplan and Zalutsky & Pinski, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 17, 2003No. 03-1303Published
1Opinion of the Court
352 F.3d 1125
Albert BETHEA, et al., Plaintiffs Appellants,
v.
ROBERT J. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES; Law Offices of Melvin James Kaplan; and Zalutsky & Pinski, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-1303.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued September 9, 2003.
Decided December 17, 2003.
Timothy M. Kelly (argued), Beerman, Swerdlove, Woloshin, Barezky, Becker, Genin & Londo, Chicago, IL, for Appellees.
Phillip A. Bock (argued), Macey, Chern & Diab, Chicago, IL, for Debtor-Appellant.
Before CUDAHY, EASTERBROOK, and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
1
Three debtors in bankruptcy…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rinaldi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.