CUNA Mutual Life Insurance v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiff CUNA Mutual Life Insurance Company seeks a refund of an alleged federal tax overpayment. The United States contends that the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury regulations interpreting the Code do not entitle plaintiff to a refund. We must defer to the interpretation of the Code provided by defendant’s regulation absent circumstances not present here. Plaintiff is not entitled to a refund under that interpretation.
BACKGROUND
I
Plaintiff claims entitlement to policyholder dividend deductions totaling $33,379,532 with *661respect to its taxable year 1986.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. Portland Cement Co. of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cuna Mutual Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012