Legal Opinion

CUNA Mutual Life Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 31, 1997No. 96-369 TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

HODGES, Judge.

Plaintiff CUNA Mutual Life Insurance Company seeks a refund of an alleged federal tax overpayment. The United States contends that the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury regulations interpreting the Code do not entitle plaintiff to a refund. We must defer to the interpretation of the Code provided by defendant’s regulation absent circumstances not present here. Plaintiff is not entitled to a refund under that interpretation.

BACKGROUND

I

Plaintiff claims entitlement to policyholder dividend deductions totaling $33,379,532 with *661respect to its taxable year 1986.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Commissioner v. Portland Cement Co. of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cuna Mutual Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API