Legal Opinion
Buckner v. O'BRIEN
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 14, 1997No. 1-96-0248PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice South
Plaintiff, Jack L. Buckner, filed a four-count complaint against defendants, Atlantic Plant Maintenance, Inc. (Atlantic), Sedgwick James of Illinois, Inc. (Sedgwick), Patrick J. Holden (Holden) and James L. O’Brien (O’Brien), alleging retaliatory discharge for his pursuit of a workers’ compensation claim and civil conspiracy arising out of the same conduct. Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his claim against O’Brien.
The operative portions of plaintiff’s amended complaint directed at defendant O’Brien state as follows: In count I, plaintiff alleges that O’Brien formed the deliberate design…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Barr v. Kelso-Burnett Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Buckner v. Atlantic Plant Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Peaceable Planet, Inc. v. Ty, Inc. And H. Ty WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Board of Education v. HoulihanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Zerjal v. Daech & Bauer Const., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Brackett v. Galesburg Clinic Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.