Legal Opinion

Krusemark v. Stroh

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1943No. 27469. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunn

This case is a direct appeal from a decree of the probate court of Will county directing a sale of real estate to pay the debts of Louis Stroh, deceased, in which the claim of appellant, Dora Stroh, to a homestead in the premises is denied, with a finding and decree that such homestead is vested in another person. The right to a freehold estate of homestead is involved, and dience a direct appeal to this court is proper. Jones v. Jones, 281 Ill. 595.

The facts are as follows: The estate involved is that of Louis Stroh, deceased. Louis Stroh and Dora Stroh were husband and wife, occupying the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Stahl v. StahlIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Claussen v. ClaussenIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Barkman v. BarkmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lamp v. LampAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Remillard v. RemillardIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Classen v. HeathIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Taylor v. BukowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Naguit v. ScrivnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API