Legal Opinion

King v. Ohio & M. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided December 4, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Chancery. Intervening petition of Matilda Wingate, administratrix.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The claim in this case is for damages on account of the death of Alexander Wingate, who, on the twenty-eighth day of March, 1882, while a passenger in the cars of the defendant, going from St. Louis to Louisville, was shot and killed by one Haynes, a fellow-passenger. Some time after the departure of the train from St. Louis, Haynes, who had been drinking freely, was transferred from a sleeping-car by the conductor and porter of that car to the coach at the rear of the train, in which Wingate was riding, and in which Haynes had been before going into the sleeper. The reasons for this transfer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . Brooklyn and Crosstown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Chicago & Eastern Railroad v. FlexmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Flint v. Norwich & New York Transportation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1868
  4. New Orleans, St. Louis & Chicago Railroad v. BurkeMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Britton v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API