Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
The issue presented in this case is whether the Southern California Rapid Transit District (RTD), a public corporation, has a duty to protect passengers aboard its buses from assaults by fellow passengers. We conclude that RTD does owe such a duty to its passengers and that RTD is not immune from liability under the facts alleged in plaintiffs’ complaint. We therefore hold that the trial court erred in sustaining RTD’s demurrer, and reverse the judgment of dismissal.
I
Plaintiffs Carmen and Carla Lopez, Yolanda and Jose de Dios and Zenaida Arce brought this action against RTD…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wormuth v. Lammersville Union Sch. Dist.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- State Department of State Hospitals v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015