Legal Opinion

DILLINGHAM

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1997No. ID 3325PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3325 In re Christopher John DILLINGHAM, Respondent File A28 992 806 - Portland Decided August 20, 1997 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The expungement of an alien’s foreign drug-related conviction pursuant to a foreign rehabil- itation statute is not effective to prevent a finding of his inadmissibility pursuant to section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) (1994), even if he would have been eligible for federal first offender treatment under the provi-…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. OZKOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  4. John Winston Ono Lennon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Roberta Charmaine Garberding v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ROLDANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  2. Gil v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Gil v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API