Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Rezultz, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
This case raises the question whether a representative of a party that is not a natural person, e.g., a corporation, may be excluded at trial from the courtroom pursuant to a witness-sequestration order. We hold that such a representative may not be so sequestered, but that the sequestration in this case was harmless error.
-I-
Although the sole issue before us raises a procedural point, a brief description of the underlying facts will aid comprehension of the case. Sometime in 1986 appellant, Rezultz, Inc. (hereinafter Rezultz), decided to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. TalbotSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- State v. DiModicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Ivar J. Queen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Loigman v. TP. COMMITTEE OF MIDDLETOWNSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Hardwicke v. American Boychoir SchoolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Township of LyndhurstNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- State v. BaumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- In re the General Election of November 5, 1991New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.