Legal Opinion

Steenberge v. Low

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by plaintiff, as receiver in supplementary proceedings, to recover certain real estate.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, J. M., J.

The plaintiff, as receiver in supplementary proceedings of Leslie W. Low, brings this action to *286recover certain real estate which was devised to the defendants Leslie W. Low and Harriet Low, his wife, “ for and during their natural lives and the natural life of the survivor of them,” contending that the defendants are tenants by the entirety, and the husband had the sole right of possession during their joint lives, and that he has succeeded to that right. The authorities in this State hold, to the contrary, that a husband and wife who are tenants by the entirety occupy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Importers & Traders' National Bank v. QuackenbushNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Faneuil Hall National Bank v. BussingNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Moyer v. MoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Albany City National Bank v. GaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bartkowaik v. SampsonOneida County Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API