People v. Beifuss
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
In each of these cases the defendant has been convicted of violating section 41.27, subdivision (b), of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, and appeals from the judgment. This code, adopted as an ordinance, appears to be a compilation of previously existing penal ordinances of the city of Los Angeles. Section 41.27 deals with the subject of intoxication, and subdivision (b) thereof reads as follows: “No person shall be on any private premises or in any private house in a state .of drunkenness or intoxication to the annoyance of any other person. ’ ’
This ordinance is attacked as unreasonable,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re PeppersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Medical Finance Assn. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Rudolph v. Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.