Legal Opinion

Marten v. Wagner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1947No. 32491PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, C.J.

This is an action by Viola Wagner, guardian of the estate of Mary A. Friend, an incompetent, against W. J. Marten to cancel a mineral deed conveying to Marten an undivided one-half interest in the minerals in and under 160 acres of land in Kingfisher county. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

Plaintiff, in her petition, alleged that at the time of the execution of the conveyance, Mary A. Friend was of unsound mind, was legally incompetent to transact her own business, and was incapable of understanding, and did not understand the effect of the mineral deed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Miller v. FolsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Antle v. HartmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Canfield v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Graff v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Tate v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Mock v. StricklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Higgins v. PipkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Blagg v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API