Legal Opinion
State v. Huskey
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided August 13, 2001No. E1999-00524-CCA-R3-CDPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · TiptonJoseph M. Tipton, J.
DAVID H. WELLES and DAVID G. HAYES, JJ., joined.
The defendant, Thomas Dee Huskey, brings this interlocutory appeal, contending that the double jeopardy protections of the United States and Tennessee Constitutions bar a retrial following the jury’s deadlock on four counts of first degree murder. He argues that the trial court failed to declare a mistrial and manifest necessity did not compel one, that prosecu-torial misconduct and judicial overreaching precipitated the jury’s inability to reach a verdict, and that the trial court erroneously failed to accept the jury’s special verdicts.…
3Cases cited45 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Joey DeWayne ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HuskeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- State v. HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
- State of Tennessee v. Antonio Maurice JacksonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
- State of Tennessee v. Brenda WoodsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.