Legal Opinion

Breece v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarksoN, J.

This cause has heretofore been before this Court, Breece v. Oil Co., 209 N. C., 527. At p. 530 we said: “The allegations in plaintiff’s reply setting forth the fraud is well pleaded. Whether on a trial it can be substantiated is another question.”

We do not think that on the trial the plaintiff’s plea of actionable fraud or deceit can be sustained. Plaintiff could read and write, was an intelligent man, had been in business for 55 years, was formerly a school teacher, has served as United States Commissioner for 12 years, and now holds said office. There was no trick or connivance to prevent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorrity v. Greater Durham Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Breece v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Sexton v. LilleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API