Legal Opinion

Hjorth v. Whittenburg

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1952No. 7711Published

1Opinion of the Court

121 Utah 324 (1952)

241 P.2d 907

HJORTH et al.

v.

WHITTENBURG et al.

No. 7711.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Decided March 11, 1952.

Clinton D. Vernon, Atty. Gen., J. Lambert Gibson, Deputy Atty. Gen., J. Richard Bell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

George S. Ballif and Ballif & Eggertsen, Provo, for respondents.

CROCKETT, Justice.

The question here involved is: Where the Utah State Road Commissioners acted in good faith to improve a highway, are they personally liable for consequential damages to adjacent property? We hold they are not.

In connection with certain improvements and changes in Highway U.S. 89,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. State Road Commission v. District Court, Fourth Judicial Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hjorth v. WhittenburgUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co v. CleggUtah Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API