Legal Opinion

Simpson v. City of Topeka

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 14, 2016No. 114484Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 114,484 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS TERI SIMPSON; WILLIAM RIPHAHN; DAVID SPECHT; CLAY NEAL; LYNN BISHOP; BRUCE ANDREWS; ROGER WILCOX; JOHN BELL; KATHY HUSEMAN; and GENA BROOKS, Appellants/Cross-appellees, v. CITY OF TOPEKA, Appellee/Cross-appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In order to preclude…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Dennis v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Richard G. Allen v. Adage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API