Legal Opinion

Arnote v. Southwestern Pipe & Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1941No. 30261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action to recover damages of the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, on account of the latter’s alleged conversion of certain steel pipe upon which he claimed mortgage liens. The trial court sustained motions interposed by the defendants for judgment in their favor on the pleadings, and from said judgment plaintiff has perfected this appeal.

Plaintiff’s petition, omitting the prayer and formal parts, reads as follows:

“Plaintiff further states and alleges that on or about the 16th day of July, 1937,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Hurie v. QuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Shortridge v. SturdivantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Cardin Bldg. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Boland v. BolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Wewoka v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Morgan v. Vandevers Dry Goods CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Stuckey v. Bank of TrumannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API