Legal Opinion

United States v. Buendia-Rangel

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 9, 2008No. 07-40879PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

In this criminal appeal we are asked to remand the district court’s judgment for correction of a clerical error. Finding no such error, we AFFIRM the judgment.

Defendant Raymundo Buendia-Rangel (“Defendant”) was indicted for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 as an alien who had previously been removed from the United States and who was subsequently found in the United States without the consent of the Attorney General or Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Defendant pled guilty to the charge. The district court entered a judgment, which lists the “nature of the offense” as “[r]e- entry…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Angeles-MascoteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Vargas-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. GuneraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Martinez-EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. Guerrero-RobledoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Norman VarnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. PletnyovDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. United States v. German GomezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API