Legal Opinion
Deanna Jo Shea v. Karla L. Smith, Scott Baker, Robert Rumgay
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 11, 1992No. 91-3720PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Deanna Jo Shea appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Karla Smith, Scott Baker, and Robert Rumgay, in a section 1983 claim. Shea alleged that the defendants violated her Fourth Amendment rights when they entered her house without a warrant and searched the premises. The district court granted summary judgment against Shea because the defendants enjoyed qualified immunity.
Our review of the summary judgment is plenary. Hines v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 926 F.2d 262, 267 (3d Cir.1991). We will construe the facts in the light most favorable…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Joanna Pacitti, a Minor, by Joseph Pacitti, and Stella Pacitti, Her Parents and Guardians v. MacY MacY East, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Daniel J. Leveto v. Robert A. LapinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Kounelis v. SherrerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Kornegay v. CottinghamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.