Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1990No. 00358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This is an appeal from the February 15, 1990 order denying appellant relief without a hearing under the Post-Conviction Relief Act. Since we conclude there there is no dispute that the issues raised in this appeal are not cognizable under the PCRA, we affirm.

Resolution of the issues raised in this appeal requires a comprehensive review of the evidence introduced at the trial of appellant, Kendall Pitts. Appellant was convicted by a jury on June 5, 1987, of carrying an unlicensed gun and of first degree murder in connection with the shooting death of nineteen-year-old Derrick…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. PerdueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. WeinderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. VelasquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EaddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. LassenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. GrierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. HarveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Com. v. Stultz, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API