Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Nieweroski

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 3, 1940Published

1Per curiam

Although an attorney who appears in that capacity for himself as a party is ordinarily entitled to costs, plaintiff here is not. By subscription to the summons and complaint and moving upon the ground sworn in his affidavit that he appeared in person and not as an attorney, and accepting the benefits of the order granting him the relief sought under section. 95 of the Municipal *1076Court Code, he elected to sue and appear as a lay person. In Rathkopf v. Coussa (233 App. Div. 86) plaintiffs appeared in person, but subscribed themselves as “ Attorneys for plaintiffs,” served their own notice of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rathkopf v. CoussaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API