Legal Opinion

Rathkopf v. Coussa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

The plaintiffs are attorneys and counselors at law and brought an action against the defendants to recover for professional services rendered. The amount sued for was $500. The complaint and the answer were verified. The defendants demanded a jury trial.

The plaintiffs appeared on their own behalf, signing the pleadings in their own name, as attorneys for themselves, as follows: “ Attorneys for plaintiffs in person,” “ Rathkopf & Rathkopf, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, appearing in person.”

The plaintiffs contend: (1) That they appeared in person, even though they subscribed themselves as “…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. SemenzaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  2. Barondess v. McNultyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  3. Dirkes v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  4. Rosenberg v. NieweroskiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API