Meigs v. State of Florida

In this ease the plaintiff in error was convicted for violating the proyisions of Section 1 of Chapter 10123, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1925, by having in his possession certain salt water tront of less length than 12 inches from tip of nose to fork of tail.

The evidence shows convincingly that salt water trout fish of the prohibited size were found in the place of business of the plaintiff in error. The evidence further shows that the business engaged in by the plaintiff in error was that of a wholesale and retail fish dealer. The Court will take judicial cognizance of the fact that a license…