Legal Opinion

State v. Hopkins

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1995No. 22079PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEELY, Justice:

Brian Hopkins appeals his conviction for shoplifting, third offense and the fines imposed as part of his sentence. On appeal, Mr. Hopkins argues that his conviction should be reversed because the circuit court improperly used his prior uncounseled shoplifting convictions to enhance his sentence. Because a sentencing court is not prohibited from considering a defendant’s previous valid uncounseled misdemeanor convictions in sentencing him for a subsequent offense, we affirm his conviction and the fines imposed as part of his sentence.

On 26 October 1992, Mr. Hopkins allegedly…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. HonakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. NicholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State of Iowa v. Archaletta Latrice YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. State v. PotterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. McCraineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API