Legal Opinion

Calkins v. Chicago, Milwaukee St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. J. H. Preston, Judge. Action for damages for a personal injury. Verdiet and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals,—

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. The petition charges that while plaintiff entered between the tender of the locomotive and a freight car to couple them together, and while he was in the act of making said coupling, and without any negligence on his part, “the engineer in charge of said engine, carelessly, and recklessly, and without aPy warning to plaintiff, suffered the brakes of said engine to become suddenly detached from the wheels, and in consequence thereof said engine and tender were permitted to back down with great force and violence, by reason of which plaintiff was caught by the right hand between the draught…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smola v. McCaffreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  2. Riley v. Town of Iowa FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manatt v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Herkimer v. KeelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. KrogmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Huss v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API