Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Kosydar
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOoRRigan, J.
The appellant Tax Commissioner urges reversal of the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision on the ground that the board erred as a matter of law in applying the standard of "generally accepted accounting principles” instead of the standard of “true value.” Appellant maintains that R. C. 5711.16 and 5711.18 require the inclusion of depreciation in factory overhead when computing the value of a manufacturer’s inventory for purposes of the Ohio personal property tax. The Tax Commissioner maintains further that his method of computing the “true value” of the inventory in question is in conformity with…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aluminum Co. of America v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Progressive Plastics, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Tele-Media Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Compuserve, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.