Legal Opinion

Cole v. Foster

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1950No. 17205PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Cole insists that his motion to dismiss the petition should have been granted for the reason.that, under the act, the board of commissioners did not have the right to require the payment of the money to be made to them, as the act requires that the money be paid to the treasurer of the board of commissioners.

In a suit for mandamus, the duty sought to be enforced must be one arising by law, either expressly or by necessary implication. The law must not only authorize the act, but must require it. Sibley v. Park, 175 Ga. 846 (166…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trotzier v. McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Dewitt v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Sibley v. ParkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Wood v. Puritan Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Freeney v. GeogheganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gunby v. YatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Capriulo v. Bankers Life Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. McCallum v. AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. McCallum v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  5. Atlantic Steel Co. v. KitchensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API