Legal Opinion

Terry L. Arcoren v. Wenton Peters and John Schooler

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1987No. 86-5119SDPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUMBAULD, Senior District Judge:

Ever since Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 66 S.Ct. 773, 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), it has been settled that, under some circumstances, by virtue of the principle ubi jus ibi remedium, a person whose clearly established constitutional rights are violated by federal officials may sue them directly even though no legislation by Congress exists specifically authorizing such a remedy. See 403 U.S. at 396-97, 91 S.Ct. at 2004-05 [Fourth Amendment]; Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 234-48, 99…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Terry L. Arcoren v. Wenton Peters and John SchoolerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Kenny v. Block (In Re Kenny)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. Bellecourt v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  4. Arthur H. Russell v. Bill Hardin, and Major McPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API