Legal Opinion

Willie Harris v. T.J. Forsyth and F. Christensen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 14, 1984No. 83-3394PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

Appellant, Willie Harris, proceeded in forma pauperis in his appeal from a summary judgment in his § 1983 action. A panel of this court affirmed the district court’s dismissal on summary judgment. See Harris v. Forsyth, 735 F.2d 1235 (11th Cir.1984). Subsequently, appellees timely filed a bill of costs requesting the entry of an order taxing costs in the amount of $38. On June 20, 1984, appellees’ request was returned from the clerk’s office unacted upon. An accompanying form contained the following explanatory postscript:

In an appeal that this court affirms, costs cannot be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flint v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  2. Marks v. CalendineDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1978
  3. Willie Harris v. T.J. Forsyth and F. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. David Richard Moon v. Lanson Newsome, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Roller v. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Sales v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Ronald Weaver Leo McKaye Morris Martin v. Raymond Toombs Robert Brown, Jr. Donald Mason Robert Mulvaney Ted StrassburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Elizabeth Smith v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API