Legal Opinion
Sting Security, Inc. v. First Mercury Syndicate, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 14, 1992No. Civ. JFM-91-1140PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MOTZ, District Judge.
Sting Security, Inc. (“Sting”), Patrol Command Systems, a division of Sting and Robert D. Arscott, Jr., president of Sting (collectively “Sting”) have brought this action seeking a declaration that their insurer, First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. (“First Mercury”), has a duty both to defend and indemnify them in connection with a lawsuit currently pending in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. First Mercury has filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that it is under neither duty. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
I
A
Sting, a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- George Bartholomew v. Appalachian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Champion International Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Brenner v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thomas Francis v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Diamond State Insurance v. Chester-Jensen Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.