Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2011No. 08-CF-693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OBERLY, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellant Martin “Tony” Brown of second-degree murder while armed, based largely on statements made by the victim, his grandfather. Appellant argues that (1) the trial court erred by admitting the victim’s statements under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, (2) admission of the statements violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause, and (3) there was insufficient evidence to prove that appellant was armed with a dangerous weapon. We hold that appellant’s claims lack merit and affirm his conviction.

I. Factual Background

Appellant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Antoine Mayhand v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Castillo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API