Legal Opinion

KLAUSER ON BEHALF OF WHITEHORSE v. Babbitt

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 1, 1996No. 95-C-193-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

In this civil action, plaintiff David James Whitehorse Klauser asks the court for 1) a declaration that the amended Indian Land Consolidation Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2201-2211, is unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause as the act applies to interests in real property owned by his deceased grandmother, Annie Greencrow Whitehorse, and 2) an injunction preventing the Department of the Interior from implementing the act with respect to those property interests. The case is presently before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fredericks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API