Legal Opinion

DREYLING v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 2008No. A08-274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

Relators Carol and Roger Dreyling challenge the decision of the Minnesota Tax Court affirming an order of the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) assessing additional income tax and interest arising out of joint income tax returns filed by the Dreylings for taxable years 2001 and 2002. The Dreylings argue that the tax court erred in concluding that Roger Dreyling was a Minnesota resident for income tax purposes. We affirm.

Roger was born and raised in Minnesota, and married Carol in 1958. In 1966 he graduated from medical school, and later he established a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Manthey v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Commissioner of Revenue v. StampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Sandberg v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Dreyling v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Mauer v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Larson v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API