DREYLING v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Relators Carol and Roger Dreyling challenge the decision of the Minnesota Tax Court affirming an order of the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) assessing additional income tax and interest arising out of joint income tax returns filed by the Dreylings for taxable years 2001 and 2002. The Dreylings argue that the tax court erred in concluding that Roger Dreyling was a Minnesota resident for income tax purposes. We affirm.
Roger was born and raised in Minnesota, and married Carol in 1958. In 1966 he graduated from medical school, and later he established a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Manthey v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Commissioner of Revenue v. StampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Sandberg v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Dreyling v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Mauer v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Larson v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013