Legal Opinion

Cane v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1985No. 09-83-211 CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of aggravated kidnapping, and subsequently perfected appeal to this court. We reversed the conviction in a published opinion. Cane v. State, 698 S.W.2d 366 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1984). We reversed because the court included in its charge to the jury “Objectives of Law” which were a portion but not all of the preamble to the Penal Code contained in TEX.PENAL CODE ANN sec. 1.02 (Vernon 1974). The State then perfected appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals in which a majority held that we erred and that it was discretionary on the part of the trial judge.

Subsections…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Cane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API