Legal Opinion
Noble v. Sombrotto
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 28, 2003No. CIV.A. 94-302(EGS), [126-1], [127-1], [128-1], [144]PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion is issued pursuant to this Court’s Order of September 30, 2002.
Plaintiff David Noble, Jr., proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 501(b), alleging that individual defendants, high-ranking officers of the National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO (NALC), violated their fiduciary duties under the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA) (codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. (2003)) by making unauthorized payments to themselves from union funds. Presently pending…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frank Sabolsky v. Michael Budzanoski Appeal of Louis A. AntalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Monzillo v. BillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Brink v. DaLesioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Noble v. SombrottoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Saunders v. HankersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Noble v. SombrottoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Laborers'dist. Council of Washington, Dc and Vicinity v. Laborers'intern. UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Noble v. SombrottoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008