Legal Opinion

Jamar Washington v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2013No. 49S02-1212-CR-669PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

In this case the defendant alleges that the trial court improperly instructed the jury regarding his claim that he was acting in defense of another. The defendant argues that the Court of Appeals misinterpreted our precedent in this area. Finding that the trial court did not err in its final instructions when it used the existing Indiana Pattern Jury Instruction on defense of another, we affirm the defendant’s conviction but remand the case to the trial court to correct an error in the abstract.

Facts and Procedural History

Jamar Washington lived with his girlfriend, Dynasty…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Gilmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Boyle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Littler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dannie Carl Pattison v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Tyrone Winkleman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Cory Lowden v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Christopher Cowans v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Chris D. Hawkins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API