Legal Opinion

United States v. $579,475.00 in U.S. Currency

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2019No. 16-3646PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal concerns the pleading requirements for a verified claim in a civil forfeiture proceeding. The case is governed by the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, which supplement the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A prior decision of this court held that a claimant who contests a forfeiture must state its interest in the disputed property "with some level of specificity," and that "a general assertion" of an interest in property is insufficient to satisfy the governing rule of procedure. United States v. $154,853.00…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. $196,969.00 United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. S.A.A. v. Samantha GeislerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  2. United States v. $284,950.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Christopher HesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. $1,106,775 in US CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  5. United States of America v. $17,332.00 U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2026

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API