Legal Opinion

Hunsinger v. Hofer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1887No. 12,564PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee brought this suit to set aside a conveyance executed by John A. Hunsinger to Peter Hun-singer, alleging in his complaint that it was executed to defraud the creditors of the grantor.

The claim of the appellee to subject the land to sale on execution was based on-a judgment obtained against John A. Hunsinger for the seduction of the appellee’s wife, and on the trial the court permitted the appellee to prove a conversation with Peter Hunsinger, in which, he spoke of the intimacy between John A. Hunsinger and the appellee’s wife, and of the probability that it would cause great loss…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Card v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Riehl v. Evansville Foundry Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Daniels v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Rhodes v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Eacock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. James v. Oakland Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Stolte v. KarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Stewart v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API