Broadnax v. Griswold
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
PITTMAN, Judge.
This appeal concerns the application of Rule 17(a), Ala. R. Civ. P., which provides, in pertinent part, that “[e]very action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest,” to a situation involving payment of a covered loss by an insurer when the pertinent insurance policy expressly provides for a transfer of the insured’s rights of recovery to the insurer upon such a payment.
In December 2004, the owner of a 1999 model Toyota Camry automobile, Charlina Broadnax (“the owner”), filed a civil action in the Montgomery District Court against Lashundra Shamon Griswold…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITERS v. LiaoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- C. D. Herme, Inc. v. R. C. Tway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Steele v. GoosenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Keisker v. FarmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
- Thomas v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Ala., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Ledesma v. PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024
- Ledesma v. PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024