Legal Opinion

Broadnax v. Griswold

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 18, 2008No. 2061190PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

This appeal concerns the application of Rule 17(a), Ala. R. Civ. P., which provides, in pertinent part, that “[e]very action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest,” to a situation involving payment of a covered loss by an insurer when the pertinent insurance policy expressly provides for a transfer of the insured’s rights of recovery to the insurer upon such a payment.

In December 2004, the owner of a 1999 model Toyota Camry automobile, Charlina Broadnax (“the owner”), filed a civil action in the Montgomery District Court against Lashundra Shamon Griswold…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITERS v. LiaoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. C. D. Herme, Inc. v. R. C. Tway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  4. Steele v. GoosenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Keisker v. FarmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
  2. Thomas v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Ala., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  3. Ledesma v. PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024
  4. Ledesma v. PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API