Pidcock v. Nace
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Colquitt superior court—Judge W. E. Thomas. April 10, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The contract upon which this action is based is set out 'in substance in the decision rendered by this court upon a former hearing. Pidcock v. Nace, 14 Ga. App. 183 (80 S. E. 526). The plaintiffs, prior to the entering of the remittitur reversing the *795judgment rendered on the first trial, amended their petition, by alleging a complete performance by them of the contract in question and (based upon that performance as a consideration) alleged an agreement by the defendants to assume all debts then owing by the Star Lumber Company, except such (if any) as had been contracted by E. S. Nace and C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armistead v. McGuireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Illges v. DexterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Erskine & Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Lynch v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- McLelland v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burden v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- ORKIN EXT. COMPANY, INC. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co. v. LoftinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Lindwall v. LindwallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.