Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co. v. Loftin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Code § 20-704 (7) provides as follows: “When a contract is partly printed and partly written, the latter part is entitled to most consideration.” So construed, the lease, which provides that the lessor “will pay the cost of the remaining portion of the duct” not “inside the premises leased,” does not show on its face: (a) that the lessor was merely called upon to install the outside portion of the duct after it had been purchased by the lessee, or (b), in connection with the printed provision, that the lessee should have done this work because the same was demanded in compliance with a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis & Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Stewart v. Lanier House Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Middleton v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Baker v. GoddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Bush v. FourcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chambliss v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- General Gas Corporation v. CarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Hardman v. Dahlonega-Lumpkin County Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Foshee v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Westminster Group, Inc. v. Perimeter 400 PartnersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.