Legal Opinion

McMillan Co. v. Marrs

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1925No. 4387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

Relator seeks a mandamus against respondent to require him to do and perform the ministerial or statutory duties which it has a legal right to have performed in regard to its contract with the State of Texas for the purchase of certain textbooks, to-wit: New Physical Geography, by Tarr; Elements of Agriculture, by Warren; The New Civics, by Ashley; and supplementary readers: Everyday Classics; Primer; First Reader; Second Reader; Third Reader; each by Baker and Thorndike.

The facts of this case in all essential particulars are the same as those contained and stated in the case of Laidlaw…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charles Scribner's Sons v. S.M.N. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Laidlaw Bros. v. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Am. Book Co. v. Marrs, Supt.Texas Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API