Legal Opinion

Martindale v. Richmond

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1990No. 89-244PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The appellant appeals from a letter of caution issued by the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct after the Committee found he violated Rule 1.9 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. After our de novo review of the record, we affirm. See Sexton v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, 299 Ark. 439, 774 S.W.2d 114 (1989).

Jeffrey Richmond initiated this proceeding by filing a complaint with the Committee alleging that, in June 1982, he hired the appellant to file a divorce suit against Richmond’s wife, Adele. The Richmonds…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sexton v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First American Carriers, Inc. v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. McClanahan v. HamiltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Sturdivant v. SturdivantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. McAdams v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. First American Carriers, Inc. v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API